On the absence of rhyme during the reading window
Page after page I read, and then
another page I turn
and lovely things are popping up
but I confess I yearn
for rhymes sustained and intricate
and not just at the end
but in between and profligate
and bursting to transcend
the free-ish verse and couplets
(which can be very nice
but there are such a lot of them)
and rhyme’s a sort of spice
that’s still employed by lyricists –
they put it in their songs
and people seem to like it
as if it still belongs.
I don’t want rhyme in every text
but I’d like to see it more
and when Professors, sorely vexed,
say English is ‘rhyme poor’,
that’s why we don’t write well with it,
that’s why it’s out of use,
I hereby say To hell with it –
that’s merely an excuse!
[This post is in honour of George Simmers
who has now been running Snakeskin webzine
for no fewer than twenty years, and is himself
a rhymester sans pareil.]
When you subscribe to the blog, we will send you an e-mail when there are new updates on the site so you wouldn't miss them.
The only poems I can write are brainless rhyming ditties,
And if you lot don't like them then I'm sorry, it's tough titties!
Sorry, lowering the tone again. But actually I agree with the sentiments of this blog totally Nell! Here's to rhyme - and to George and Snakeskin too!
I nearly SAID 'All comments on this blog' should be rhymed.
So this one was well-timed. ;-)
Thanks for the honourable mention, Nell.
You state the would-be rhymer's problem well.
Though in Italian, most words rhyme with most,
So lazy bards can indolently coast
From rhyme to rhyme without much need for thought,
In English, tyro poets can get fraught
When finding rhymes not growing in abundance
For those who want to make a clever pun dance
Or get a metaphor performing stunts.
They hate the feeble rhyme that only blunts
Their free expression, so they choose instead
To wave a banner saying 'Rhyme is dead!'
They're really saying:'It's hard! It can't be done.'
(But others say: 'It's hard - that's why it's fun!')
Ah, rhyme. Along with metre it's a test
some poets fail (OK, a lot). The best
glide through it as on well-oiled roller-skates -
think Byron, Auden, even that guy Yeats.
And you and George are stellar, showing how
rhyme's still a part of what we're writing now.
But there are stumblers, fumbling with it; sadly,
they clunk and clonk and do it awf'lly badly.
I do like this poem now I know
I risk being drowned in my woe
I cried all day long
Till I read your song,
But must I read Ted Hughes's Crow?
Rhyme, for me,
To be blunt,
It's not a stunt,
But useful formality
That echoes out lyrically.
Sonnets, couplets, other rules
Do not oppress, are merely tools
That please with ease,
Just the place that frees
The soft significance of ease
Of skills with words
Permitting us to sing like birds.
How To Write The New Poem
Not like this for Chrissakes! Most agree
a regular beat –– and rhyme –– has gone with rock-
the brain’s brainless delight in feeling groovy.
Be bored with anything that doesn’t trouble
with the latest shiny box of avant tricks,
crossword puzzle Utopia’s building bricks.
Meticulously compose each pile of rubble.
Sentence discord is still in. Try to gauge
where the branch will never break then tear and twist
till it does, leaving a little ragged fist.
Let clarity go cross-eyed in its cage.
It’s all a lucky dip. Just mix and match,
be full of in-jokes, slangy and erratic,
wittily obscure and fiercely vatic:
another litty reference. Ready? Catch!
Poems should have designs on us, our skin
politicised and stratified and skewered,
musical phrases preferably obscured
by tin-eared Text: staves are for staving in.
The narrative that can’t be arsed, the cul-
de-sac that needs a totem-pole of signs
all pointing elsewhere –– here’s what underlines
our sense of where we are: the void, the null.
Phew, Mark. :-)
Or (to counteract my huffing and puffing) there's this, from good old Anon: