Unsuitable blog and HappenStance news

What's happening at HappenStance

Sphinx-related posts

WHY WRITE POETRY REVIEWS?

LONG-PI_20221102-184434_1 Pamphlets in waiting

And come to that, why read them? If I pick up a magazine that mixes poems and reviews, will I turn avidly to the reviews? Nope. Unless – just possibly – I know there's something controversial in one of them. I will start by reading the poems: first the poets I know, then the ones I don't. I may get to the reviews later. Maybe.

There's only one type of review people turn to immediately with an adrenalin spurt — yes, it's the one that features their own poems. In fact, it may be the only thing they read in the magazine.

Poets generally like to get reviews of their books, though they don't always like the reviews they get. They're far less keen on the writing side, that is to say writing reviews of other poets' books. A few, however, do take on the review task regularly, uncomplainingly and reliably. They are usually – but not invariably – unpaid. Reviewers are the Cinderellas of poetry. There are no national prizes or shortlists for them (fortunately). Occasionally, of course, a review does draw considerable attention by upsetting people, generally unintentionally.

Since 2005, I've been running Sphinx Review: an online publication offering short written responses to poetry pamphlets. I have a co-editor (Charlotte Gann) and a team of 14 – 25 reviewers. Each time a set of reviews is ready, an email newsletter goes out. We have just over 400 subscribers; the 'open' rate is about 33% and the click rate 45%. People may also arrive at individual reviews through FaceBook, Twitter, email and word of mouth. Some of them are widely read. Some are copied onto other websites. Some are hardly read at all. But since they're online, they're there for as long as the site lasts. They help make a poet googlable.

Running Sphinx Review costs masses of time and a growing sum of money. I've been doing it since 2005, with unpaid helpers. It's getting more difficult to afford, in every sense. Next year, when I'm seventy, I will stop. My bones are creaking.

But why start it in the first place? I thought it was important. I still do. I'm a publisher. I put out books and pamphlets and I want them to be noticed. I want there to be a conversation. And I believe in putting your money, as they say, where your mouth is.

The Sphinx approach to reviewing has always been unconventional, and bound by certain principles. We review nearly all the pamphlets that come in, not just the classy ones. We run more than one review for a pamphlet, provided we have more than one copy. When we have new reviewers, we work with them to build confidence and sharpen style. Our reviews are short – hopefully too short to be boring. Our editors (Charlotte Gann and myself) are dedicated and painstaking.

I believe it's good for poets to write reviews. It makes them better readers; it makes them think things through. It makes them look closely, makes them re-read, check references and examine their own prejudices. It teaches them poetry tricks they can use themselves and poetry faults they can avoid. Writing good, accessible reviews is an art worth working at.

Ah but I find it easier to say why poets should write reviews than why they should read them. I'd like to think people might read interesting and original reviews for pleasure. But do they?

This forthcoming Saturday 5 November, I am taking part in a poetry panel as part of the Push the Boat Out festival in Edinburgh, a live event. We will be wrangling over the ins and outs of reviewing. And the very next day, on Sunday 6th, HappenStance poet D A Prince will be on a panel in Poetry in Aldeburgh doing something similar, a live event with a live-streamed option. If you can get to either, please do come along, bringing your ideas and opinions with you. Or post them below. Do you read reviews of poetry books and pamphlets? And if so, why?

  831 Hits

Twelve Reasons Why Poets Should Write Reviews

Okay: here goes.

  1. Poetry is a communication — a message in a bottle. A review is a reply.
  2. There is no shortage of poets. But good poetry readers are rare. Reviewing helps you read well.
  3. Reviewing is educative. You look up the references, you look up the poet, you pay attention. You learn things you never knew you didn't know.
  4. Reviewing poetry gives craft insight: you see new tricks to try, and also some to avoid.
  5. Most poets like to have work reviewed. If you give reviews, you get reviews (not always in equal proportion).
  6. Poets need to write well in prose too. Reviewing (with an editor and some constraints) strengthens prose style and confidence.
  7. Poetry books are costly, especially if you read widely. But review copies are usually complimentary.
  8. Reviews are an art form. Writing them is creative. 
  9. Reviewing strengthens your profile as a writer and extends your network.
  10. People sometimes think reviews are about criticism or praise. Not necessarily. They are (or can be) about expressing interest and encouragement.
  11. Reviewing is a way of paying respect to the community you're part of, putting your money where your mouth is.
  12. A book and its reviews are a conversation anyone can join, provided they use words carefully. Join the conversation!


Please take a look at sphinxreview.co.uk with its ongoing resource of OPOI reviews, and, if you can bear a few more emails in your inbox, subscribe to the list. 

This will mean you get notifications about new material on the site, mainly new OPOI reviews. Such emails tend to come in little flurries when groups of reviews are posted. If it drives you nuts, you can unsubscribe at any time.

OPOIs are short reviews of poetry pamphlets which focus on only one point of interest (OPOI) in not more than 350 words.

Far more poets would like their pamphlets to be OPOI-ed than would like to write the OPOIs. Forty-three poetry pamphlets have been received for review this year so far, and only three new reviewers have offered their services. More are needed. Over 60 pamphlets are waiting hopefully.

Some poets don't have the confidence to write reviews. They are nervous of this role, which they see as authoritative and judgmental. OPOI reviews are neither. They are edited before they go public. They are a good thing to do, and if you are reviewing for the first time, the ideal place to start.




  5239 Hits

Wanted! Echoes for rose petals. . .

So what is an OPOI again? 

Continue reading
  4032 Hits

ALL CHANGE AT SPHINX!

The days of three reviews per pamphlet have come to an end.

Continue reading
  5261 Hits

IS A POETRY REVIEW EKPHRASTIC ART?

The answer is no. But then the answer could be yes.

 

Continue reading
  14642 Hits

LABOUR OF LURK

It makes no commercial sense. Perhaps not even any other kind.

Continue reading
  12340 Hits